Comment

Comment by SkLeAmS #05 on April 20, 2010 at 12:32am

still going strong!!!!...haha

Comment by Kaline on March 13, 2010 at 1:26am

Comment by Sione on March 12, 2010 at 11:39pm

I just knew I would get in trouble over sex. :)

Comment by Sione on March 12, 2010 at 4:31pm

Its the smileys that got me in trouble :)

Comment by Sione on March 12, 2010 at 4:30pm

Apologies Kaline. I forgot the smileys. After reading my comments I realise how it was sent in the wrong light.
Re birds and bees - I meant observations of nature around us and the natural things that nature does rather than the unnatural that men do.
Re Dr Oz. I had not heard of him until now but after googling him I see he is very well followed and respected. He is not shown on TV here in Tonga.
Re unjoin. I was expressing my own shortcomings and describe the expression as more of turning into a street and thinking this is not the one and considering turning around or continuing on to see where it leads. Nothing intended towards the Group.
re intended insult. Definitely not intended.
Perhaps for me it is like walking into a shopping mall and seeing so many new things around but then deciding to look at one shop at a time until I became familiar with everything.
There is also the issue of the Pacific pseudo-conservative opinions which is affected by upbringing and taboos etc. I agree.
Again to you and the Group my humblest apologies. No offence intended.

Comment by Kaline on March 12, 2010 at 5:18am

Click on topic "The Truth About the Birds and the Bees" to view first vid :) :)

Comment by Kaline on March 12, 2010 at 5:17am

The Truth About the Birds and the Bees
Sione, we've attached 2 vids similar to what the sex educator in NZ used as tools in Form 1. From then on it got more graphic naturally as presentations are permitted to be sensitively be divested upon pre and early teens. Your comparative of the highlighted discussion topics@DrOz and your ignorance is reflective of your own issues about sex, for Dr Oz's shows are revised versions of layman's classes spun for the average consumer on national networks, direct derivatives of his classes in Columbia University. Your intended insult is noted and is nothing more than a fickle ignorant Pacific Islander with your pseudo-conservative opinions. Pacific islanders of the modern day have moved beyond FAKE-ISMS.

If your flavour is of the animal kingdom variety, as in beastiality, this group isn't for you - for it is strictly for human to human forms of congress. If your angst is directed more towards the heavy censorship of presentation, then the group "Casual Encounters" might be better suited. If you are still after something more graphic, akin to pornography, google your flavour of beastiality online.

If you so decide to leave this group, our salutions for your minute support, however long it lasts.

Comment by Kaline on March 12, 2010 at 2:13am

Comment by Kaline on March 12, 2010 at 2:06am

Dr Oz was the conscious choice for the majority of discussion topics on our part when we received what can not be categorised as anything other than defensive reactions (which is progressive), for to address anything at all about this determining subject will demand personal sexual regards of individual's sexual limitations and boundaries of what is 'okay about sex.'

Dr Oz: forumhttp://ezinearticles.com/?Who-is-Dr-Oz?&id=1954516

Since Dr Oz was the medically approved medium who stands as one of the authorised experts by the public media, we figured that is best we post his relevant group episodes rather than having to address it from our individual perspectives about sex, which will prove to be deemed as graphic.

Comment by Kaline on March 12, 2010 at 1:55am

This group was established for the purpose of addressing what may not 'qualify' in the forum discussion topic feature section when subtle conflicts occurred (relevant to censorship), where some didn't at all appreciate any remote approach and direction through participatory written posts of what some regarded as 'too sexual and inappropriate and an overplay' for the general topic discussion, other then the fact that it was decided that since Love, Relationship, Human Sexuality and Sexology related questions were popping up allover the place, a group was the only form of appropriateness for the more delicate who may then be provided the option to clearly avoid any such discussion suited to their individual limits of little to zero dialogues of any such topic.

Human sexuality in its multifaceted form is a beautiful portal for us as a community to discuss as the bridge between our gender differences and shared sex, relationship and intimacy matters, for fair representation to identify the positives, the negatives and neutrals about sex from a general community consensus.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 6
• Next ›
• Page